Skip to content
Noble Impact Awards
Noble Impact Awards

Judging Process
& Criteria

Independent Evaluation. Meaningful Recognition.

Every Noble Impact Awards entry is evaluated through an independent blind judging process conducted by the Grand Jury Panel. Each submission is assessed solely on its own merits using a consistent set of judging criteria, ensuring fairness, integrity, and international credibility across every category.

Winning Levels

There are FOUR (4) distinguished levels of winning within the competition:

The Highest Distinction

Noble Impact
Honors

The Noble Impact Honors are the awards’ highest distinctions, selected exclusively by the Grand Jury from eligible Platinum Winners.

Platinum Winner

Presented to entries demonstrating exceptional achievement, measurable outcomes, and lasting positive impact.

85–100Points

Gold Winner

Recognizes entries delivering outstanding performance, innovation, and meaningful contributions within their field.

75–84Points

Silver Winner

Honors high-quality achievements that demonstrate excellence, purpose, and positive impact across their respective category.

65–74Points

To maintain the highest standards of quality, a category may have multiple winners or, at times, none. Each submission is meticulously critiqued and rated by consensus, with the esteemed panel of judges determining a rating on a scale of 100 points.

How the Judging
Process Works

  1. Step

    Eligibility
    Review

    Each submission is reviewed to confirm it meets the competition's eligibility requirements and category selection.

  2. Step

    Independent
    Blind Judging

    Entries are evaluated individually by members of the Grand Jury Panel based solely on the submitted materials.

  3. Step

    Score
    Compilation

    Individual evaluations are compiled to determine award winners according to the Noble Impact Awards scoring standards.

  4. Step

    Results
    Announcement

    Award results are officially announced, recognising the selected winners and their outstanding contributions based on the Noble Impact Awards evaluation standards.

Judging Criteria

Every Entry Is Evaluated Using 5 Key Criteria

Every entry is evaluated independently by an international panel of experienced professionals through a fair and impartial blind judging process. Entries are assessed based on 5 key criteria:

Impact

The significance of the positive change created and its measurable value for people, organizations, communities, industries, or the environment.

Innovation

The originality, creativity, and forward-thinking approach demonstrated in developing the solution, initiative, or achievement.

Effectiveness

The ability to achieve its intended objectives through meaningful results, measurable outcomes, and overall success.

Execution

The quality of planning, implementation, craftsmanship, and overall delivery in bringing the achievement to life.

Measurable Outcomes

The evidence of tangible results, lasting influence, and meaningful benefits generated through the achievement.

Independent
Grand Jury

The Noble Impact Awards is judged by an independent Grand Jury Panel comprising respected leaders, executives, academics, innovators, public sector professionals, and industry experts from around the world.

Their diverse expertise helps ensure every submission receives thoughtful, impartial, and internationally recognized evaluation.

Alice Jasmine Crippa
United States

Alice Jasmine Crippa

Creative Futurist
Zeus Jones

Shadi Al Hroub
United Arab Emirates

Shadi Al Hroub

Founder and CEO
MENAMONSTERS

Joseph D’Souza
Canada

Joseph D’Souza

Founder and CEO
ProNavigator

Alex Brodsky
Poland

Alex Brodsky

CEO
Playsense

Naina Ruhail
India

Naina Ruhail

Founder
Better Beauty

Rocco Baldassarre
United States

Rocco Baldassarre

CEO and Founder
Zebra Advertisement

Ready to Present
Your Impact?

Prepare your submission with confidence and join organizations, leaders, and innovators creating meaningful change around the world.

Enter Your Impact Now
Your privacy matters